This project replaced the existing washed-out culverts with a precast concrete arch bridge. This crossing had multiple washouts of the culverts in the past 20 years. It was reported that a buildup of timber, logs, and other debris at the upstream end of the culverts was a recurring problem.
Mona Road is a higher priority county gravel road with a considerable amount of traffic; therefore, the stream crossing required a higher state of reliability. The county chose to replace the culverts with a bridge to reduce the potential buildup of debris at multiple culvert inlet obstructions and reduce the potential future washout.
Beaver Creek flows generally in a northern direction from its headwaters, which are approximately 20 miles south of Mona Road crossing. The watershed is predominately forest and mountainous. The basin area is approximately 59,900 acres with an approximate flow length of 33 miles.
A hydrologic and hydraulic study was conducted to determine the volume and characteristics of flow needed for the structural design of the project. A multiple modeling approach was considered before determining the flow rates at the project location.
Because of the washout history of the site, a bridge option was considered as the best solution.
Among different bridge options, a concrete arch bridge was selected as a suitable solution for this site. A concrete arch bridge with an approximately 48’ span was installed. During a 100-year storm event, the structure will have approximately 36” of freeboard above the estimated high water elevation.
We conducted hydrologic and hydraulic studies of the crossing location in relation to the structure configuration. We also performed a feasibility study and reported to the Board of Commissioners on the proposed alternatives. Our team provided structural design of the bridge, foundation, wing walls, and guard rails, and prepared the plans and details. Finally, our team provided technical specifications and a project manual, in addition to bidding phase assistance and construction contract administration.
The site presented a challenge in its quite remote location which necessitated a structural system that minimized on-site labor. Therefore, precast materials were used as much as feasible. A challenge encountered during construction was the variability in depth and quality of the shallow bedrock at the site. This required field modifications to the foundation.